Skip to content

Apollo vs ZoomInfo

How about Cognism? 

  • Access to global data without geographical restrictions (NAM, APAC, and leading EMEA coverage).
  • 2x more cell phone numbers than Apollo and other providers. 
  • 47 million mobiles in the US alone.
  • Phone-verified cell phone database.
  • Research and verification service on demand.
  • CCPA & GDPR compliance with broader DNC list cleaning.
  • Intent data powered by Bombora.
  • AI Search for building target lists brimming with quality data faster.
  • Seamless integrations with best-in-class tools (Outreach, Salesforce, etc.)
  • Simple, predictable pricing.
  • Unrestricted viewing and page-level exporting of emails & cell phone numbers. Subject to a generous fair usage policy.
  • Easy set-up.

Unconvinced? Scroll to see the differences between ZoomInfo vs Apollo 👇

Book a call and sample our data 👇

Apollo vs ZoomInfo: Data

Buyers frequently compare how many email addresses and direct phone numbers ZoomInfo and Apollo.io have.

Here’s a summary of those numbers:

  • The ZoomInfo contact database is said to have 220 million active contacts, over 150 million email addresses and 50 million direct dials in its contact database. 
  • In comparison, Apollo.io has over 265 million contacts at over 70 million companies, 165 million email addresses and 120 million phone numbers (according to Apollo.io’s homepage).

Both ZoomInfo and Apollo are based in the US, and according to Klue, a market intelligence platform, this is where their data coverage is the best.

According to Apollo.io T&Cs, its extensive database includes user-submitted data. So, by using Apollo, customers agree to give Apollo an irrevocable license to use their data, even after they stop using Apollo’s software. So even if you’re signing up for their free plan, you’re adding to their database.

On the other hand, ZoomInfo has built its platform by acquiring competitors. In recent years, its focus seems to have shifted from providing prospecting data to providing a sales workflow management solution.

Which is more accurate, ZoomInfo or Apollo.io?

Despite their best efforts, no data provider is 100% correct in all areas. A recent survey of Pavilion members who recently evaluated ZoomInfo vs Apollo’s data quality revealed areas where both providers could improve.

Survey participants mentioned Apollo’s weak email verification and missing cell phone numbers, whereas ZoomInfo needed to improve its global data footprint, especially EU coverage and refresh its contact information.

Tired of hit and miss? Try Cognism

  • 2x more cell phone numbers worldwide than other providers.
  • 47 million cell phone numbers in the US alone.
  • Exclusive phone-verified mobile numbers dataset (Diamond Data®).
  • AI Search: create your ideal contact or account list with text and voice prompts.
  • CCPA & GDPR compliant.
  • DNC cleaning in 12 countries.
“Cognism defeated all the other lead generation providers by a huge amount. Its database had an 80% accuracy rate and the highest coverage of mobile numbers”
Michael-Iannuzzi
Michael Iannuzzi
Director of Marketing & Sales Development @Drift
80%
data accuracy

Cognism is serious about data quality, compliance and accuracy. It has excellent coverage in the US and is a leader in providing EMEA contact data. 

How does it compare to Apollo.io and ZoomInfo? 

Unlike Apollo.io, Cognism is transparent about the regions its database covers. What’s more, Apollo admits to ”scraping from hundreds and millions of websites, and according to Apollo.io’s T&Cs, users give Apollo a permanent license to use and share any data they submit. This means you’re giving Apollo permission to use any data in your CRM in its database. 

When you use Cognism, your customer data stays with you.

Cognism gathers B2B data via its proprietary sources and fills in gaps from third-party data providers, publicly available sources, manual research, and strategic partnerships. The tool processes millions of data points each day to create and update its Person and Company profiles.

Similar to Cognism, ZoomInfo implements thorough data-checking procedures to maintain accuracy and assigns confidence scores to contact profiles in its database.

But the main difference between ZoomInfo, Apollo.io and Cognism is Diamond Data®, Cognism’s exclusive data asset.

Diamond Data® includes phone-verified mobile numbers, increasing the likelihood of connecting with your ideal customer by three times. The team verifies these numbers and incorporates contacts that customers request through the Diamonds-on-Demand® service.

Diamond Data® helps sales teams reach 87% of prospecting lists. Companies are experiencing a 54% rise in mobile coverage, and ROI is improving because 70% of outbound meetings are scheduled using Cognism mobiles.

“If you are looking for a B2B provider to power the UK, Europe and North America, Cognism's got you covered”
Paul-Thomas-Lead-Forensics
Paul Thomas
CEO @Lead Forensics
50%
increase in team performance

How about phone-verified cell phone numbers? 

Diamond Data®

Diamond Data® is Cognism’s premium phone-verified database of cell phone numbers. Our data research team checks the numbers’ accuracy by calling the prospects. 

  • Over 10m+ phone-verified contacts globally
  • Phone-verified mobile number accuracy to help you connect with 87% of your list.
  • 3x increase in connect rate.

Cognism’s data team can also source and verify cell phone numbers on demand. Neither ZoomInfo nor Apollo.io offer similar services.

ZoomInfo vs Apollo cost

The main difference between Apollo.io and ZoomInfo’s pricing?

Apollo pricing offers monthly and yearly subscriptions and a self-service signup flow. In contrast, ZoomInfo offers long-term contracts, and its pricing is available after a consultation. 

For this reason, Apollo.io is generally considered to be cheaper than ZoomInfo and other sales prospecting tools.

Despite these differences, Apollo’s and ZoomInfo’s prices are based on a credit system that limits viewing and exporting data. Monthly caps, resets, and expensive ‘add-ons’ often pose some challenges:

  • Scarcity mindset among your team — reps are more focused on optimising credit consumption than developing best practices for prospecting.
  • Unpredictable spend — e.g. ZoomInfo charges a credit for every company and contact export which may consume double the credits if the account isn’t already in their CRM. Similarly, Apollo charges one credit for email and another credit for a phone number. Apollo.io reviews on G2 complain about the low credits and high costs.
  • Limited opportunities - companies with an international presence or trying to expand to new markets may find the price for ZoomInfo’s Data Passport for prospecting outside the US hard to justify.
  • Slow growth — despite relatively cheap plans, Apollo offers very limited access to mobile and export credit (max. 125 and 2000, respectively, in its highest plan). It may become problematic for businesses with ambitious growth goals or companies in highly competitive markets.

Pricing that solves these ZoomInfo vs Apollo pain points

Cognism is seat-based, and licence cost depends on your required workflow.

Packages
Global data
Integrations

Seats for individual contributors and teams with operational workflows with bulk-list building and exporting.

Unrestricted* access viewing and individual & page-level exporting mobile numbers and emails (vs Apollo’s limits on mobile and export credits).

No extra charge for access to global data — NAM, EMEA, and APAC (vs ZoomInfo’s regional data add-ons).

All packages include firmographic data, technologies, and sales trigger events.

Access to the Cognism Web App, integrations (including two-way Salesforce integration), and Cognism Chrome Extension that fit into your workflows.

Apollo vs ZoomInfo: Compliance

ZoomInfo is CCPA and GDPR-compliant. The provider also checks do-not-call lists in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, New Zealand, the UK, and the US.

Apollo.io is CCPA compliant and also claims it’s compliant with GDPR. Apollo has recently started offering DNC list cleaning in the UK and US only. The provider charges one credit if a phone is revealed to be on a DNC list and claims it is then at the users’ discretion to decide whether to call or not.

Why is DNC list cleaning important?

If a salesperson reaches out to someone who has opted out of sales and marketing phone calls, they may be accused of not having “a legitimate interest” in contacting that person.

The Information Commissioners’ Office (ICO) has issued fines totalling £180,000 for two companies that made more than 480,000 unlawful marketing calls to businesses signed up with the UK’s “Do not call” register.

Cognism is GDPR compliant by default

If compliant data is your number one priority, Cognism has the edge over ZoomInfo and Apollo. In addition to being CCPA and GDPR compliant, we check more European DNC lists than ZoomInfo and Apollo.io.

Cognism checks the DNC lists in the following countries to remove the risk from our customers:

  • TPS/CTPS in the UK.
  • DNCs in the USA, Canada, Australia, Germany, France, Spain, Ireland, Belgium, Croatia, Portugal, and Sweden.
“Our legal team reviewed ZoomInfo’s GDPR standards in Europe, which were not up to scratch. As a result, they removed the European team’s access to the platform, which massively impacted our sales output.”
Pierre Bourguignon SDRManager - Cloudreach
Pierre Bourguignon
SDR Manager @Cloudreach
100-150 leads
per week per rep

Apollo vs ZoomInfo: Integrations

Integration capabilities are important when comparing ZoomInfo and Apollo.io.

Both are end-to-end platforms that aim to consolidate tech solutions. Having more features in one tool means less internal work and a smaller tech stack. However, the downside is that both platforms focus on developing proprietary technology rather than investing developers’ time into improving integrations with other tools. 

That said, ZoomInfo offers integrations with popular CRM systems and marketing tools for smooth workflow integration.

Apollo may not offer as many integration options as ZoomInfo. This may limit its usability for organisations needing extensive connectivity with different tools.

If you already use best-in-class solutions, like Salesforce and Outreach, you may find using all-in-one platforms limiting or buggy.

Looking for a provider that integrates into your tech stack?

Cognism is investing in building robust integrations and workflows to allow your sales team to reduce unnecessary admin and manual work needed to get the data in their systems. 

Cognism Chrome Extension is a game-changer in the SDR world. It works over Outreach, HubSpot, and Salesforce so that you can enrich prospect records without leaving the tools.

“ZoomInfo’s plug-in took approximately 20 seconds to load a lead, and more often than not, the contact details were incorrect. This was a productivity drain. With Cognism, it’s either instant or takes four seconds. The plug-in’s velocity enables quick-fire prospecting.”
Michael-Iannuzzi
Michael Iannuzzi
Director of Marketing & Sales Development @Drift
5x
faster LinkedIn prospecting

Expanding into new markets?

Drop manual processes and drive quality data adoption with Cognism’s AI search:

Cognism AI Search connects you with your ideal prospect 75% faster. 

Build your list or find decision-makers with three different search routes:

  • Text-to-command search: Think of your ideal target list and then type it into the search bar.
  • Direct prospect or account search: Got a specific person in mind? Search for them by typing in the AI Search bar.
  • Voice search: Expanding into new markets? Our voice search has multilingual support to help you prospect in your native tongue.
AI Search Graphics_4a-1

Intent data: ZoomInfo or Apollo.io?

Another significant difference between Apollo.io vs ZoomInfo is the source of their intent data.

ZoomInfo leverages proprietary machine-learning technology to recognise leads who are ready to buy. It collects intent data from a variety of sources, and it’s believed ZoomInfo relies on bidstream data

Apollo Intent, on the other hand, partnered with LeadSift (a Foundry company), which gathers buying intent in several ways, including crawling millions of public web documents, such as social media sites, blogs, forums, research sites, and hiring boards. 

Want access to an exclusive intent data source?

Cognism partners with Bombora’s intent data: 

  • Is consent-based and collected from a cooperative of 5,000 B2B sites, where B2B buyers actively research a topic when they’re ready to make a purchase. 
  • Considers the historical baseline or typical content consumption when calculating intent.
  • Considers the context and the length of each interaction.
  • Has a 70% exclusive dataset.
  • Tracks 12,000+ intent topics (vs ZoomInfo).
“Cognism identifies the leads, allows us to target them based on the prospect’s intent and then follow-up with the sales action. Using intent data has massively reduced our Time to Engagement (TTE). Our sales cycle is typically 6-8 months long. At Cognism, we saw ROI in 8 weeks from intent data and direct dials. One deal pays for a year’s Cognism subscription.”
George-McKenna-Ultima
George McKenna
Head of Cloud Sales @Ultima
8 weeks
taken to achieve ROI

EMEA revenue teams 👋 fed up with using ZoomInfo in Europe?

Stuck in a contract with ZoomInfo but need better European contact data? Click through to see how Cognism can help you exit your contract.

Which is better in the UK and Europe, ZoomInfo or Apollo.io?

Some North American companies use ZoomInfo and Apollo in the US. However, when they have subsidiaries or customers in the UK and Europe, they turn to Cognism to get better European coverage than ZoomInfo.

Cognism prides itself on being a leader in European data and GDPR compliance. Choosing regional providers across different offices helps international businesses complete and validate data their primary vendors provide.

“We trialled Apollo, which didn’t produce adequate results. We evaluated ZoomInfo but found the data to be too US-centric, which is why we went with Cognism”
oneupsales
Marc Parsons
SDR Manager @OneUp Sales
60%
closed deals with Cognism’s mobile numbers

Which is better, Apollo.io or ZoomInfo?

Both providers have extensive databases, but you may find they lack company or contact data in your niche or target market. So the best way to evaluate Apollo.io vs ZoomInfo is to sample their data.

Book a call with our team and get a sample of Cognism data. Our sales rep will run a live search in our database to source leads that match your ICP.

ZoomInfo vs Apollo FAQs

Here are some commonly asked questions about ZoomInfo and Apollo 👇

Both ZoomInfo and Apollo have extensive datasets in the US. However, ZoomInfo and Apollo both provide lead generation and sales intelligence. They serve different users and needs.

ZoomInfo is best for larger companies that need contact data and advanced features, but it is more expensive.

Apollo is a more affordable option. Its transparent pricing makes it better suited to smaller businesses and startups looking for flexibility to scale up or down. 

The choice between ZoomInfo and Apollo depends on specific needs, such as budget, desired features, and the importance of data accuracy.

To make an informed decision, potential users should consider conducting trials of both platforms when available.

ZoomInfo has a higher credit-based pricing model due to its many features, but it is a decent option for Enterprise companies.

On the other hand, Apollo offers flexible credit-based pricing, which is better for startups and small businesses that don’t want to spend too much. 

When it comes to the numbers, ZoomInfo has 220 million active contacts, including 150 million emails and 50 million phone numbers. In contrast, Apollo.io boasts over 265 million contacts across 70 million companies, with 165 million emails and 120 million phone numbers.

But what about accuracy?

Both platforms have large databases, but their methods of checking data can affect its reliability. ZoomInfo uses a mix of contributions, machine learning and human-research, while Apollo depends more on user input, which may result in inconsistencies.

Yes, both are sales intelligence solutions that offer similar services, but they have key differences, namely:

  • Apollo is a comprehensive sales platform equipped with AI-driven revenue features, whereas ZoomInfo primarily emphasises contact data and CRM integration.
  • Apollo specialises in sales automation and email sequencing tools, whereas ZoomInfo is recognised for its database and advanced search filters.
  • Some consider Apollo to be more budget-friendly than ZoomInfo, which can range from $20,000 to $40,000 annually for a limited set of data.
  • ZoomInfo complies with both CCPA and GDPR regulations, whereas Apollo is compliant with CCPA and states that it is also GDPR-compliant.
  • ZoomInfo checks its data against DNC lists in several countries, while Apollo has just begun checking against DNC lists in the UK and US.
  • Both platforms have large contact databases, smart search tools, and data enhancement features. They help businesses connect with potential customers and automate tasks.

The main differences between Apollo and ZoomInfo are the features, target audience, pricing, data, and integrations. Both tools offer several features to help sales and marketing teams increase ROI. 

When considering these sales intelligence tools, leaders should take into account that apollo.io is better for smaller teams looking for affordable data, while ZoomInfo is better for large organisations requiring more complex integrations. 

Apollo.io pricing is credit-based and can be charged monthly or annually. Depending on your plan, you’ll expect to pay $0 to $119 per user.

Pricing for ZoomInfo is much more complex. It is also credit-based, paid annually and customised for your business needs. While pricing is not publicly available, you can expect to pay over $10,000.

User experience is important when comparing ZoomInfo and Apollo.

ZoomInfo has a sophisticated user interface with advanced search capabilities, which helps users find specific leads or accounts. However, some users might find it overwhelming because of its many features.

Apollo, in contrast, has a user-friendly interface, which simplifies lead generation, making it easier for less tech-savvy users.

People use ZoomInfo for its extensive data in the US and because its a go-to-market (GTM) platform. When considering expansion into other markets, like Europe, other alternatives, such as Cognism, might be better. 

Although Apollo has some CRM-like capabilities it’s primarily a prospecting tool. You can integrate Apollo with popular CRMs like HubSpot and Salesforce.

Need more convincing?

Visit direct comparison pages to learn more about the differences between ZoomInfo vs Apollo and how they compare to Cognism.

“We reviewed Cognism and tools like Lusha, Seamless.AI and ZoomInfo.” “I think from the outside, these tools look very advanced and fancy. They claim to be a 5-in-1 solution, or they can do anything we want to do.” “But we had a trial for one and discovered that the database was not very up to date. Compared to Cognism, it’s very old. The European database is not as strong as Cognism.” “In terms of pricing, they were very expensive, and everything is an ‘add-on’, so the packages alone are very limited. For example, you’d have to spend double the amount to get something as simple as a new filter.”
michael-wong
Michael Wong
Head of Marketing @Plandek
85%
improvement in data quality and enrichment

Put Cognism to the test

Forget about Apollo vs ZoomInfo!

Cognism is dedicated to powering global sales funnels by providing the most accurate and compliant data. We’ve helped B2B businesses:

  • Increase qualified leads by 60%
  • Decrease speed to lead time by 93%
  • Increase meetings booked by 70%
  • A 240% increase in opportunity creation.
  • A 51% increase in retention and growth.

Try it for yourself! Click to get a free data sample 👇